Archive for May, 2008

Ikon Visit

There are two excellent exhibitions at Birmingham’s Ikon gallery until July 20th:

The first is entitled ‘Impressions from the Interior’ (click for installation video) and features the work of Swiss artists Lutz and Guggisberg who have been in partnership since 1996. It is their first exhibition in the UK.

The exhibits include 200 wooden birds made out of old pallets and scorched with blowtorches (‘Population’) which fill the floorspace in one of the galleries. They are absurd depictions of birds, some with nails for beaks and some with oversized feet – and some are hardly recognisable as birds. Walking through, it feels like you’re in the final scene of Hitchcock’s iconic film as you wander amongst them.

‘Wash the World’ is a video installation in which a mad professor uses a machine to turn back time. It’s strangely surreal watching huge waterfalls run in reverse, and I stood there for quite a while, mesmerised by the strangeness of it.

The second exhibition is by Cinthia Marcelle, and is a video installation called ‘Confronto’ (click for still). It’s a looped film of a set of traffic lights at a busy city junction (in Belo Horizonte, Brazil apparently.) When the lights first go red, two fire-jugglers march into the centre of the road, juggle until the lights turn green, and then exit. This is repeated twice more, with 4 and then 6 jugglers present. However, on the final occasion, 8 jugglers (well, actually 6 jugglers and 2 people who just wave their arms about) stand in the road, blocking it completely, and stay there – even when the lights go green! Cue lots of car horns – one of the performers even gets driven at by an irate driver, and a motorcyclist blasts through a gap at quite a speed. The screen then goes black and the car horns segue seamlessly into musical notes until they are faded out.

The Ikon gallery always has something to delight. What’s more, it’s free and the cafe does the best-tasting food I’ve had for years. Their stuffed peppers are a must.

Leave a Comment

Nil Points for Eurovision Voting Bias

Please bear with me if I seem a little… weary. I’ve just sat through the marathon dirge-fest that is the Eurovision Song Contest, live from Belgrade.

“Gary – why do you put yourself through 3 hours of the very worst Euro-caterwauling?” you might ask. Although I couldn’t hear you if you did – my brain has involuntarily blocked any more sound from entering, just in case it’s another Eastern European uber-diva singing ever-so-slightly off-key.

It’s been a tradition in my family for many years that we all congregate around the TV in the lounge with a bottle of wine and some food that would give Gillian McKeith a panic attack, and moan and whinge our way through three hours of the campiest, trashiest, pappiest pop known to infest human lug-holes.

Except that we never used to moan or whinge.

We used to laugh at the outrageous costumes of some of the more obscure European countries who, we suspected, may never have heard of the Beatles. Or indeed ‘melody’.

We used to titter at the ineptitude of the presenters, and snigger at the dodgy phone-line connections between far-off lands that, at some point, must have passed through a system of tin-cans on strings.

And we used to howl at Terry Wogan’s good-natured sarcasm on the cheesiness of the presenting, and the occasional political bias that crept into the voting – especially the annual Greece/Cyprus love-in.

That was the enjoyment of Eurovision. Sneering at our European neighbours in a very British way, while simultaneously – and often secretly – enjoying the whole spectacle for what it was – a fun, shared experience that we also had a chance of winning.

But not any more.

Political voting has taken over the competition to the extent that we now shout out the votes before they’re revealed on screen, like a warped continental, bastardised version of panto.

Terry Wogan’s sarcasm now has a biting edge to it that betrays his dissatisfaction with the bias within the contest. He clearly hates how this once-naff-but-lovable institution has become so poorly produced that ‘Wayne’s World’ had better presentation standards.

And there’s as much chance of the UK submitting a winning entry as there would be of Johnny Vegas becoming the next Miss World.

Now before you dismiss these sentiments as the warblings of someone who’s taking the whole thing much too seriously, think about this: the BBC bank-rolls a huge chunk of the Eurovision’s funding, which means that you and I – the licence-payers – are paying for taking part in a competition we can never win, no matter how hard we try. Paul McCartney himself could enter, and we would still be beaten by a one-eared, one-armed lute-player from Serbia because the other former Yugoslavian countries like his tie.

In other words, it’s a farce.

Terry Wogan virtually announced his retirement from the commentary at the end of this year’s show, and you could hear how pissed off he was with the political bias. Phone voting may be democratic, but it doesn’t reward song quality.

Our entry this year came joint last. It was beaten by at least 5 or 6 songs that could well be used by the American military as a water-boarding substitute in Guantanamo Bay. My ears certainly feel like they’ve been tortured.

Next year? No Eurovision. We’ll up the standard a bit, and hire a karaoke.

Comments (3)

Rip-Off Alert

There are quite a few things that make my blood boil these days. I think I’ve watched too many episodes of One Foot in the Grave. One of the things I can’t stand is when low-life companies seek to make money out of the desperate and vulnerable.

There was a bit of a furore recently over a number of loan companies advertising on Facebook who hadn’t been advertising their rates as they are legally obliged to do. Now they are toeing the line, we can all now see why they were so hesitant in revealing all.

Take ‘Logbook Loans’, for instance. They advertise unsecured personal loans on Facebook for people who have bad credit. So what rate – given that the normal APRs for unsecured loans from reputable banks are around 20-30% at the most – are these charming people charging those who are desperate to be able to afford their own car? 40% APR? No. 50%? Er – no. Surely not over 100%?

No. Try 437%.

Yes, that’s right. 437% APR typical.

The ‘typical’ part means that it is very possible some rates are even higher!! It gets even scarier if you do the maths:

Let’s say you want to borrow £1500. What can you buy for that? A second-hand Corsa? Something along those lines probably. And how much would you eventually expect to pay back over – say a year and a half? It’s not that long, so – £2000? £2500?

£4180.00

That’s after paying £53.60 a week – over £200 a month. Shocking. I wonder what the payback amount is like over longer terms? Of course, those aren’t stated on their website.

Of course this company is operating entirely legally, and is selling the loans as an ‘opportunity’ for people who can’t otherwise get credit. But surely there can be no reason at all, even if work depends on it, for going into that much debt – and paying that much over the odds – for a car.

There should be laws limiting the APR companies can charge. People take their own lives through mis-managed debt, and vulnerable people should be protected against getting themselves into severe amounts of debt to fund what they perceive as essentials.

I’ve seen other APRs quoted much higher in Facebook ads – one was over 1000%. If you see any, let me know.

Comments (1)